Sheridan v. Reese
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Daniel E. Sheridan against Samuel E. Reese. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Rule to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. Exceptions to the rule overruled, and he applies for writ of prohibition.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Plaintiff obtained a writ of injunction, restraining defendant from cutting timber upon certain lands, and, after a *228trial of the case on the merits, obtained judgment making the writ perpetual, from which judgment defendant obtained an order for a suspensive appeal, and thereafter, proceeding with the cutting of the timber, was ruled to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. He excepted that the court had been devested of jurisdiction by the appeal, and, his exception having been overruled, he now applies to this court for the writ of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chretien v. PoincySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Weil v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
- State ex rel. Barthet v. HoustonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
- Torres v. FalgoustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- State ex rel. New Orleans Water-works Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. v. Webster Sand, Gravel & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Sena v. District Court of Fourth Judicial DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925