Legal Opinion

Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. v. Webster Sand, Gravel & Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 12, 1913No. 19,705PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Webster; John N. Sandlin, Judge. Action by the Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Company against the Webster Sand, Gravel & Construction Company and others. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from a judgment wherein the district court holds defendant and certain of its officers and employes guilty of contempt and, imposes fines upon them for having violated a writ of injunction by removing portions *1054of the roadbed and rails, and thereby interfering with plaintiff’s possession of a certain “spur track,” and whereby the court denies its (plaintiff’s) prayer for a mandatory injunction ordering defendant to restore said track to the condition that it was in prior to said disturbance by defendant. The facts of the ease are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Webster Sand, Gravel & Construction Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. Moses v. BankerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1868
  3. Beebe v. GuinaultSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. State ex rel. Behan v. Judge Sixth District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. Crescent City Live Stock & Slaughter-House Co. v. LarrieuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Broussard v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Red River v. NolesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Cason v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Gamburg v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Keys v. . AlligoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API