Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 28, 1993No. 91-1111PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Judgment of the CourtJustice Souter
The Sherman Act makes every contract, combination, or conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of interstate or foreign commerce illegal. 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1. These consolidated cases present questions about the application of that Act to the insurance industry, both here and abroad. The plaintiffs (respondents here) allege that both domestic and foreign defendants (petitioners here) violated the Sherman Act by engaging in various conspiracies to affect the American insurance market. A group of domestic defendants argues that the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 59 Stat. 33, as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bostic v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Integrity Collision Center v. City of FulshearCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- State v. RussoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Abrahamson v. Board of Education of the Wappingers Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Constantine v. Rectors of George Mason UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.