Legal Opinion
State v. Russo
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 10, 2008No. 1 CA-CR 07-0299PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Robert Francis Russo, Jr., appeals the superior court judgment affirming his municipal court sentences for his violations of Arizona Revised Statutes (AR.S) section 28-1381(A)(1) (2004), driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI), and A.R.S. section 28-1382(A) (2004), driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.15 or more (extreme DUI). He specifically challenges the constitutionality of the mandatory assessment of $1000 imposed upon him pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-1382(D)(6) and A.R.S. § 41-1651 (2004). We conclude that the assessment is constitutional, and we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. OkkenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Normandin v. EncantoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. BoehlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. LindnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.