Legal Opinion
Cott Beverage Corporation v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeGOHEY, District Judge.
The corporate defendant and the individual defendants Williams, Collins and the three Moores attack on several grounds the four “Causes of Action” set forth in the complaint.
The first alleges that the corporate defendant and its several directors conspired, in violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, to restrain interstate commerce in soft drinks. No others are alleged to have participated in the conspiracy.
The motion first seeks to dismiss this “Cause of Action” on the ground that it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Eastern Star, Inc. v. Union Building Materials Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., and the House of Seagram, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., Barton Distilling Company v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Cott Beverage Corporation v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.