Legal Opinion

Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Ct.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2018No. H044764Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/14/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKPOT HARVESTING COMPANY, No. H044764 INC., (Monterey County Super. Ct. No. 15CV000491 Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MONTEREY COUNTY, Respondent; JOSE ROBERTO LAINEZ et al., Real Parties in Interest. Labor Code section 226.2,1 which became effective January 1, 2016, addresses the manner in which piece-rate employees are to be compensated for rest and recovery periods and other nonproductive time on the job (collectively, rest/NP time). Subdivision (b) of the statute…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API