Murphy v. Mullin, Hoard & Brown, L.L.P.

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WRIGHT.

In this legal malpractice case, appellants appeal the trial court’s take nothing summary judgment in favor of appellees.1 In *290five issues, appellants generally contend the trial court erred by granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment because it (1) improperly applied the discovery rule, (2) failed to apply the Hughes2 tolling rule, (3) erred in concluding limitations had run as to Kane, Russell, Coleman & Logan (KRCL) and William Elliott because, even assuming the trial court correctly applied the discovery and Hughes rules, KRCL and Elliott committed…