Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1986No. 84-1945PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues presented in this appeal are: (1) whether the testimony proffered by appellee is admissible at trial despite R.C. 2907.02(D), the rape shield law; and (2) whether admitting such evidence violates Evid. R. 608(B). We find the evidence to be admissible, and thus we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

The rape shield law in Ohio, R.C. 2907.02(D),1 essentially prohibits the introduction of any extrinsic evidence pertaining to the victim’s sexual activity. The exceptions to this prohibition are evidence of the origin of semen, pregnancy, or disease, or of the victim’s past…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. KamelOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. LeuinOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. SandovalIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Demers v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Jordan v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INST.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. State v. CrimsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API