Legal Opinion

United States v. Milton Teplin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1985No. 84-5297PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEEDEN, Circuit Judge:

The defendant, Milton Teplin, appeals his conviction for traveling in interstate commerce with the intent to facilitate extortion, in violation of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3); and for attempted extortion, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 13, assimilating Va.Code §§ 18.2-26 and 18.2-59. The defendant alleges several errors in the proceedings below. Finding none, we affirm his conviction on both counts.

I

Teplin, a presently disbarred attorney from New York, had been a legal advisor of Richard Eaton, a prominent businessman in the radio and television industry. In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Robert E. Woolverton, Anna Mae Hines, and Anthony A. CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Garcia-RosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Andrew JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. James Marty StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Strohecker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. United States v. Ricardo GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API