Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
District Court, D. Utah
Decided April 17, 1998No. 1:95 CV 0094 KPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
KIMBALL, District Judge.
The allegations of The Procter & Gamble Company and The Procter & Gamble Distributing Company (collectively, “P & G”) have been previously chronicled. See Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Haugen, 947 F.Supp. 1551 (D.Utah 1996). Presently before the court, and considered in turn in this order, are seven primary motions, as well as a variety of motions ancillary to them.
*627A. Musgrove’s and Patton’s Motion to Dismiss.
Two of the individually named defendants, Roger Patton and Jeffrey Musgrove (and his dba, Musgrove Enterprises), move to dismiss for lack…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Zbylski v. Douglas County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Columbia First Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Cook Associates, Inc. v. PCS Sales (USA), Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2003