Legal Opinion
W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 28, 1986No. 81-9-01259PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DiCARLO, Judge:
Plaintiff challenges the United States Customs Service (Customs) classification of disassembled components of oil drilling rigs as “lattice masts ... and other structures and parts of structures ... of iron or steel ... other” under item 652.98, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), and 652.-99, TSUS, the successor provision to item 652.98, TSUS.
Plaintiff claims the merchandise is properly classified as “boring ... machinery ... for earth, minerals or ores ... and parts thereof” under item 664.05, TSUS, or alternatively, as “columns, pillars,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. BruckmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- The United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987