Legal Opinion

Howell v. Town of Carolina Beach

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1992No. 915SC552PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56; Bolick v. Townsend Co., 94 N.C. App. 650, 381 S.E.2d 175, disc. rev. denied, 325 N.C. 545, 385 S.E.2d 495 (1989). “A defendant is entitled to summary judgment only when he can produce a forecast of evidence, which when viewed most favorably to plaintiff would, if offered by plaintiff at trial, without more, compel a directed verdict in defendant’s favor, (citation omitted) or if defendant can show through discovery…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Evans v. CowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Wuchte v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Izydore v. TokutaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. McMurry v. Cochrane Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API