Legal Opinion
People v. Jewsbury
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified, on the law, by reinstating counts one, two, five and six of the indictment and, as modified, affirmed. Memorandum: The court erred in dismissing the first, second, fifth and sixth counts of the indictment because of legal insufficiency.
The first two counts of the indictment charge defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) with intent to sell (Penal Law § 220.16 [1], [12]). The evidence before the Grand Jury consisted of testimony of one Michael Sheehan, supported by transcripts of wiretaps of defendant’s telephone conversations, where…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. GlasperNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. PotenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ChristopherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- State v. HallerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. NorthrupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- People v. EscaleraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.