Legal Opinion

United States v. Gonzales-Barrera

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 20, 2003No. CR-02-0900-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TEILBORG, District Judge.

Pending before this Court is Defendant Jose Luis Olivas-Sanchez’s Motion to Suppress (Doc. #28) and Supplemental Motion to Suppress (Doc. # 40) (collectively, the “Suppression Motions”). Defendant Jose Luis Olivas-Sanchez pled guilty and is no longer urging the Suppression Motions. Defendant Fernando Gonzales-Barrera (“Defendant”), however, joined (Docs. # 34 and # 42) and continues to urge the Suppression Motions.

The Government filed a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and Supplemental Motion to Suppress (Doc. # 49).

In the Suppression Motions, Defendant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MILLAGA v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  2. United States v. Rodriguez-AlejandroDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
  3. Madruga Ex Rel. Madruga v. County of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  4. United States v. VasquezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Lorie Atwater v. County of Los Angeles, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API