Legal Opinion

MILLAGA v. City of Sioux City

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided April 25, 2003No. C02-4009-MWBPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION.978

A. Procedural Background.978

B. Factual Background.979

II.LEGAL ANALYSIS.981

A. Standards For Summary Judgment.981

B. Timeliness Of The Administrative Charge.982

1. Arguments of the parties.982

2. Analysis.983

a. Limitations period for administrative charge.984

b. Is there a “deferral-state agency”?.984

c. Was the charge “initially filed” with the deferral-state agency?. 984

C. Disability Discrimination.986

1. Arguments of the parties.986

2. Analysis...988

a. The…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
  2. Torrico v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
  4. Morris v. Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  5. Zei v. Maryland Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API