Legal Opinion
Esdaile v. Hartsfield
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 8, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
245 N.J. Super. 591 (1991)
586 A.2d 334
LAVERNE ESDAILE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
WINZEL HARTSFIELD, DEFENDANT, AND HAZEL FRANK GLUCK, ON BEHALF OF THE UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 23, 1990.
Decided February 8, 1991.
Before Judges MICHELS, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.
Richard J. Mirra argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Boglioli & O'Mara, attorneys; William Pfister, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).
Stanley S. Spector argued the cause for respondent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bilotti v. Accurate Forming Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hedgebeth v. MedfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Ross v. Transport of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Jimenez v. BaglieriSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- UCJF v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Esdaile v. AngleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Sumner v. UNSATISFIED CLAIMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.