Weinstein v. United States Air Force
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PARKER, Senior District Judge.
In their Amended Complaint for Violation of Constitutional Rights (“First Amended Complaint”) (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiffs express sincere concerns and allege serious constitutional violations regarding “evangelical Christian” proselytizing at the United States Air Force Academy (“Academy”). This Memorandum Opinion and Order does not reach the question of whether the alleged constitutional violations actually occurred. Instead, it addresses whether Plaintiffs have stated a claim for relief against the United States Air Force (“USAF”);…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Gohier v. EnrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Francene Tearpock-Martini v. Borough of ShickshinnyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Nicor, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Wiatt v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Scott v. Montgomery County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013