Foley v. Tennessee Odin Ins. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
This suit involves the “additional assured” provision of a public liability policy of insurance on motor vehicles. The Chancellor and the Court of Appeals rendered a decree in favor of Foley et al., and against the petitioning insurance company. Certiorari has been granted and argument heard.
The question now before us resolves itself into whether or not the insurance company is liable under the • facts of this case in view of the “additional assured” provisions of their policy which is: “The unqualified word ‘insured’ wherever used in coverage A and B and in other parts of this policy, when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Hubbard v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Haeuser v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
3Cited by17 opinions
- Estate of Adkins v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- Moore v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- English v. Virginia Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Branch v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. WittTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.