Welsh v. Pennie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing to pay interest upon an allowance of attorney’s fee. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Covet.
Philip A. Roach, deceased, died while administrator of the estate of Thomas H. Blythe; and James C. Pennie succeeded him as such administrator. Afterwards, Pennie brought a suit in equity in the superior court against the executor of said Philip A. Roach for an accounting of the acts and doings of said Roach as such administrator; and on January 15, 1891, a judgment was rendered in said suit, in which it was adjudged, among other things, that the estate of Roach be allowed the sum of ninety-five thousand dollars as a counsel fee for the services of John A. Wright, rendered to said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pennie v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Garver v. ThomanArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Keely v. Ophir Hill Consol. Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- In re Estate of KrugerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.