Keely v. Ophir Hill Consol. Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Utah.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit in equity authorized by the provisions of section 3511 of the Revised Statutes of Utah of 1898 to quiet title to a mining claim owned by complainants situated in the Utah mining district and known as the “Henrietta Lode No. 87.” This suit was instituted in the Circuit Court of the District of Utah simultaneously with an action at law brought in the same court, to recover for ore actually mined by defendants from the same claim. The action at law, according to the pleadings and stipulations of the parties, went to trial on the issue whether the ore mined…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Lawson v. United States Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Day v. Estate of WiswallArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Ward v. CharltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Liberty Bell Gold Mining Co. v. Smuggler-Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- People Ex Rel. Bear Creek Development Corp. v. District Court of the Second DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.