Legal Opinion

Buford v. O'Neal

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1961No. 41775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

Appellee, plaintiff below, sued his employers for damages sustained when he was injured in dismantling a large diesel engine in the gin of appellants. There were four charges of negligence: (1) Failure to furnish appellee and his co-workers an experienced man in the work they were doing, (2) failure to furnish a reasonably safe place to work, (3) failure to furnish appellee reasonably safe means, ways, and appliances to do the work, and (4) failure to use reasonable care to furnish appellee a reasonably sufficient number of helpers to dismantle and remove the diesel engine.

The case was tried…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hardaway Contracting Co. v. RiversMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Goodyear Yellow Pine Co. v. MitchellMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Central Lumber Co. v. PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gow Co., Inc. v. HunterMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Jefferson v. Denkmann Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Long v. WOOLLARD, & FARMERS ELEVATOR, INC. FMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lewis Grocery Co. v. BlackwellMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. FriersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. City of Meridian v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API