Legal Opinion

Hughes v. City of Lincoln

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1965No. Civ. 10927PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

On July 10, 1962, the City Council of the City of Lincoln adopted a resolution directing fluoridation of the municipal water supply, subject to the approval of the State Board of Public Health. A group of electors circulated a petition proposing an initiative ordinance to prohibit addition of fluorides to the city’s public water supply. On September 15, 1963, the city clerk submitted the petition to the council with a certificate showing that it was signed by more than 15 per cent of the municipal voters. When a proposed initiative ordinance bearing that percentage of signatures is presented…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API