Calame v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Appellants sued three defendants, all of whom filed motions for summary judgment. The motion of the first defendant was sustained and an interlocutory take-nothing judgment was rendered as to that defendant June 1, 1967. On June 9, 1967, a telegram apparently sent by appellants’ attorney directed to the trial judge was delivered to the judge’s office. It referred to the cause number, and read: “Please note our objection to granting of motion for summary judgment in favor of” the first defendant. “We will appeal this order if necessary at rendition of final judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens National Bank v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Knox Recr. v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Banker v. BreauxTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Alexander v. Bank of American National Trust & Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Hunt v. Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 2Texas Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. National Bankers Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Inverness Forest Improvement District v. Hardy Street InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Scruggs v. George A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Briercroft Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Foster Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Shepherd v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.