Legal Opinion

Inverness Forest Improvement District v. Hardy Street Investors

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 22, 1976No. 16700PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding mandatory relief and permanent mandatory and prohibitory injunctions which, in effect, ordered the defendants to construct specific utility improvements to appellees’ land, and in connection therewith to sell certain authorized and unissued utility bonds of the improvement district for use in financing such construction.

The case was tried to a jury and in answer to the only special issue submitted, the jury found that the district had acted arbi trarily in failing to provide utility services to appellees’ land. The judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lewis v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. San Antonio Bar Ass'n v. Guardian Abstract & Title Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. PetersTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Miers v. BrouseTexas Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Winograd, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  2. Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Kirby Lake Development, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. B.J. Reid v. Rolling Fork Public Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Bay Ridge Utility District v. 4M Laundry, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  5. City of Shoreacres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API