Legal Opinion

Van Diest Supply Co. v. Adrian State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1981No. 50926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Justice.

Van Diest Supply Company brought this action against Adrian State Bank to obtain a declaratory judgment that Van Diest’s subordinate security interest in assets of A & B Seed & Chemical Company has priority over a security interest given by A & B to the bank several months earlier., The bank appeals from the judicial declaration that Van Diest’s lien has priority over the bank’s lien because the bank waived, released, or subordinated its security interest to that of Van Diest by failing to advise Van Diest of its claim.

Stipulated facts relative to the creation of the parties’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King-Porter Company v. ScanlonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Second National Bank of New Haven v. DyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Wilson v. EigenbrodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Empire MacHinery Co. v. Union Rock & Materials Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Sobel v. Mutual Development, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Uni-Com Northwest, Ltd. v. Argus Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY v. MarshallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. Towers v. Moore (In Re Disanto & Moore Associates, Inc.)District Court, N.D. California · 1984
  4. Corporate Financers, Inc. v. Voyageur Trading Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Went v. Rhoden Nissan/Auto Finance CenterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API