Legal Opinion

Kaercher v. Schee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1933No. 29,359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, Justice.

Defendants appeal from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial after trial and verdict in favor of the *274plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are real estate brokers located at Ortonville in this state.

The plaintiffs’ cause of action, in substance, is that they were employed by the defendants to find a purchaser or purchasers for 1,160 acres of land in Wilkin, Big Stone, and Stevens counties in this state at a price of $15 per acre cash net to defendants; that plaintiffs were to 'get their commission or compensation from the purchasers; that plaintiffs found such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sill v. CeschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Huntley v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Vaughan v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Luhn v. FordtranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaercher v. ScheeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API