Legal Opinion

People v. Dozie

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1964No. Crim. 3405PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

After a nonjury trial defendants were convicted of first degree robbery and vehicle theft. They had met the victim, drank with him in several bars, and drove with him in his car to a rural area, where one of the defendants beat him to unconsciousness with his fists. They took what he had in his pockets, left him unconscious by the roadway and drove away in his car. Sole contention on appeal is that the robbery was not accomplished by torture or by a person armed with a dangerous or deadly weapon, therefore could not be robbery in the first degree. The People contend that a defendant’s fist,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. OdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. LuceroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API