Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Stidham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2018No. SD 35328Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

This appeal is from the setting aside of a fraudulent conveyance. We affirm.

Background1

Respondents ("Plaintiffs") are judgment creditors of Anna and Matt Stidham ("Defendant Parents") who deeded their farm and store real estate - substantially all of their assets - to their daughters Sarah and Lori ("Defendant Children") without consideration and with other badges of fraud.

Plaintiffs' amended petition against Defendants alleged that said transfer was made to defraud Plaintiffs and hinder or delay collection of money owed, then prayed for relief as follows:

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand:(a)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Diehl v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Leonardi v. SherrySupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  4. Ortmann v. Dace Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In the Interest of: K.R.T., A.J.T. and K.L.T. Missouri Department of Social Services, Children's Division v. K.T.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API