CHICAGO TCHRS. U., LOCAL NO. 1, AFT/AFL/CIO v. Johnson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLAUM, District Judge:
Before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the state defendants from refusing to process plaintiffs’ applications for Special Unemployment Assistance [SUA] on the basis of an administrative determination that plaintiffs fall within the exclusion to eligibility delineated in 26 U.S.C. § 3304 note 210. The facts surrounding this action have been set forth in two previous opinions denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss, and need not be repeated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Venus Mandley v. James L. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Long v. Thornton Township High School District 205District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Milkowski v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Harvey v. Director of the Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Herrera v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Berland v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.