Legal Opinion
Soo Line Railroad Company v. Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 19, 1988No. 87-1975PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
The Soo Line Railroad and the Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad are locked in a durable struggle attributable to the Connecting Line, some 21 miles of track between Crivitz and Marinette, Wisconsin. In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.R., 784 F.2d 831 (7th Cir.1986) (Escanaba I), holds that the Soo must arbitrate with the Escanaba about ownership of the line. (The arbitrators awarded the line to the Escanaba and fixed its price. A district court in Minneapolis enforced this award.) In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.R., 789 F.2d 1281 (7th…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sabrina Roppo v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- In Re Jartran, Inc., Debtor. Fruehauf Corporation v. Jartran, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Elmer M. Kunkel, William H. Dennler, John D. Lockton, Ted B. Westfall and William D. Robertson v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.