Legal Opinion

Allen v. Burggraf Construction Co.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1984No. 14057PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Two rural landowners, Ted Allen and D.P. Hathaway, sued a highway construction contractor, Burggraf Construction, for damages allegedly resulting from alteration of an irrigation ditch. The district court — sitting without a jury — dismissed the action after the landowners had presented their evidence. The court determined, in a memorandum decision and in an order disposing of post-trial motions, that the evidence failed to show liability on the part of the contractor.

On appeal the landowners raise two issues: (1) Was the landowners’ evidence sufficient to survive a motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alegria v. PayonkIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Bank of Idaho v. ColleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Crawford v. InglinIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Staggie v. Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Savage Lateral Ditch Water Users Ass'n v. PulleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jones v. StarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Sena v. New Mexico State PoliceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Seubert Excavators, Inc. v. Eucon Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API