Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Norton, M., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 2019No. 53 MAP 2017PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baer

In Commonwealth v. Carrasquillo , 631 Pa. 692, 115 A.3d 1284 (2015), this Court dispelled the notion that a defendant's bare assertion of innocence requires a trial court to grant the defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Instead, the Carrasquillo Court held that, in the context of such a motion, "a defendant's innocence claim must be at least plausible to demonstrate, in and of itself, a fair and just reason for presentence withdrawal of a plea." Carrasquillo , 115 A.3d at 1292. In the matter sub judice , a trial court utilized this standard in denying a presentence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. ForbesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Carrasquillo, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hvizda, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Alves, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Baker, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Bingham, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Burnitskie, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API