Legal Opinion

Shoup v. Cummins

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1929No. 19119. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

William H. Shoup and Lucy D. Shoup filed their bill in chancery in the circuit court of Sangamon county on June 28, 1927, for the partition of a farm of 248 acres, known as the Cotton Hill farm, of which their father, Samuel N. Shoup, died seized on March 10, 1886, and of another farm of 160 acres, known as the Pawnee farm, of which their mother, Alice J. Shoup, died seized of an undivided seven-twentieths on May 16, 1926. Both the father and mother died intestate, the father leaving Alice J. Shoup, his widow, surviving him, and his children, William H., Ettie May, Harry S. and Lucy D., his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Simpson v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Baird v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Grady v. MalosoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Middelcoff v. CroniseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlyle v. JaskiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Hopkins v. Hamby Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Majerus v. SantoNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Barnes v. Swedish American National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API