Middelcoff v. Cronise
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action commenced in the superior court of Los Angeles County by Mrs. Eliza F. H. Middlecoff and one of her two minor children, against her other minor child and Mrs. Maria H. Cronise, for the partition of three separate parcels of land, situated respectively in the city and County of San Francisco, Los Angeles County, and Sam Joaquin County. The husband of Mrs. Middlecoff is made a party plaintiff and the husband of Mrs.. Cronise is made a party defendant, but neither has any interest in the property.
Mrs. Cronise is interested in the San Francisco, property only, under a deed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Satterlee v. . KobbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Murphy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kitchen v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Medical International, Inc. v. FellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Barnes v. Swedish American National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.