Legal Opinion

People v. Cardenas

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1994No. B071438PublishedCited by 25 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Juan Espinosa Cardenas held himself out to be a “curandero,” or faith healer, and rendered “treatment” to various female believers of the religion Curanderismo. His activities under this guise led to his conviction of six counts of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487) and seventy counts of sexual misconduct (Pen. Code, §§ 289; 266c; 261, subd. (a)(2); 288, subd. (a); 288, subd. (b)), and findings that he occupied a position of special trust (Pen. Code, § 1203.066, subd. (a)(9)).

Appellant challenges the convictions for count 2, penetration of the genital or anal openings of Selsa…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PitmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Do It Urself Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Brown, Leifer, Slatkin & BernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. MonteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. United States v. Espinoza-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. People v. VealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API