Legal Opinion

W. C. De Pauw Co. v. Stubblefield

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1892No. 15,579PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

— This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, instituted in the Floyd Circuit Court, for the recovery of damages on account of a personal injury sustained by the appellee while acting as the employee of the appellant.

The appellant assigns as error in this court:

First. That the circuit court erred in overruling its demurrer to the appellee’s complaint.

Second. That the court erred in overruling its motion for a new trial.

The complaint alleges, substantially, that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of plate glass in the city of New Albany, where it owns and .controls, for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tabor v. Continental Baking CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Stoy v. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Verplank v. Commercial BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API