Legal Opinion

Burris v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1992No. 49A02-9201-PC-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Anthony S. Burris appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief in which he alleged the ineffectiveness of trial and appellate counsel and fundamental error. 2

We affirm.

Burris’ allegations of error each concern the “sudden heat” aspect of the voluntary manslaughter instruction which was given at his trial. Burris maintains that trial counsel was ineffective because of counsel’s failure to tender a proper instruction or to object to the voluntary manslaughter instruction which was given, which neither charged the jury that the burden of negating sudden…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Schiro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Montano v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Robertson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Moore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Edgin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API