Legal Opinion

Doe v. Londonderry School District

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 18, 1997No. Civil 95-469-JDPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DiCLERICO, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs, Jane Doe, Mother Doe, and Father Doe, 1 brought this action under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (“Title IX”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the Londonderry School District (the “District”). Before the court are the District’s motions to dismiss (document no. 11) and for summary judgment (document no. 12).

Background 2

During the summer of 1993, Jane, then age 13, became close friends with three boys from her school, John Johnson, James Jami-son, and Joe Jones. Jane began seventh grade at the Londonderry Junior High…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aurelia Davis, as Next Friend of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Doe v. University of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  4. Dipippa v. Union School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Canty v. Old Rochester Regional School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API