Legal Opinion

WILLIAM E. COPHER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2019No. SD35473PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. COPHER, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD35473 ) Filed: March 15, 2019 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHRISTIAN COUNTY Honorable Laura J. Johnson, Judge AFFIRMED William E. Copher (“Copher”), appeals from a judgment of the motion court denying his amended Rule 29.15 1 motion, which claimed that trial counsel was ineffective for advising Copher not to testify in his own defense. Finding no merit to Copher’s point relied on, we affirm. 1 All rule references are to Missouri Court Rules (2018). Factual and Procedural Background…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  3. Phillip G. Payne v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. WILLIAM E. COPHERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamar McVay v. Gregory HancockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI v. LORENZO DARNELL ROYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API