Mendel v. Waxbrown Corp.

Hagan, P. J.,

This is a trespass action which was tried before the writer of this opinion and a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,500. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequacy, and after argument before the court en banc, a new trial was granted. Defendant has appealed to the Superior Court, and this opinion is written in accordance with rule 43 of the Superior Court Rules.. In determining whether plaintiff should be granted a new trial on the ground of inadequacy of the verdict, we were not unmindful that “compromise ver*703diets are both…