Legal Opinion

(PC) Hernandez v. Marcelo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 8, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01219Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARINO HERNANDEZ ANTONIO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01219-JLT-BAK (EPG) (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FILED AUGUST 15, 2022 13 v. (ECF No. 70) 14 J. MARCELO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Marino Hernandez Antonio is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On August 15, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Motion Seeking Approval from the Court Allowing 20 Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Stored Information Under Rule 26 ….”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Faigin v. Kelly & CarucciCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. McAllan v. Von EssenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Program Engineering, Inc. v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API