Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.

¶ 1 This is appeal is from the judgment and order entered following a jury verdict in favor of Appellees 1 in an action they commenced following Appellee’s diagnoses with asbestosis and restrictive lung disease. The order at issue sanctioned Appellant based upon its refusal to settle under Philadelphia Local Rule * 212.12. We affirm the jury’s verdict, but reverse the order entering sanctions.

¶ 2 This case was tried in a reverse-bifurcated fashion with Phase I proceeding along with others consolidated for trial against a number of defendants, including Appellant. At the end of the first phase…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ludmer v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. GladdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Virgil v. Garlock, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Treu v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kessler v. BroderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Boucher v. Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Goldstein v. Haband Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Zelenak v. MikulaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Coleman, A. v. Lackner, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API