Legal Opinion
State v. Cerny
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 13, 1956No. 44722PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOHLING, Commissioner.
Ralph Cerny appeals from an order, deemed a final judgment, overruling his motion to vacate or correct a judgment imposing a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment for burglary and larceny. 42 V.A.M.S. Supreme Court Rules 27.26, 28.-03, 28.05. Our review is de novo. Rule 28.05. His conviction was affirmed in State v. Cerny, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 844.
The material portion of appellant’s motion reads:
“Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis.
“Comes now the petitioner, Ralph J. Cerny, and respectfully prays this Honorable Court to sustain this petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- People v. VernonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. NinemiresSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State v. WorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.