Oatman v. Epps
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Jackson County. The appellant was in possession of the premises at the time respondent acquired his pretended title, and demand was necessary. (Wright v. Lewis, 13 East, 210; Noe v. Jackson, 1 Barn. <& C. 448; Dennis v. Wardner, 3 Mon. B, 173; Stakehouse v. Doe, 5 Blatchf. 570; Oostigan v. Wood, 5 Cranch C. C. 507.)
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
This appeal comes here from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the county of Jackson. The respondent *438commenced an action in that court against tbe appellant to recover tbe possession of certain real property, alleging in his complaint that he was the owner thereof in fee, and that the appellant wrongfully withheld the same from him. The appel- ' lant filed an answer to the complaint, denying the respondent’s ownership of the property, and also filed a complaint in equity in the nature of a cross-bill, as provided by the Code. The respondent demurred to the complaint, and the court sustained…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Tot v. GongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Fire Ass'n v. AllesinaOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Dose v. BeatieOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Donart v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.