Legal Opinion

Riddick v. Barber PLEASE FILE IN THIS CASE ONLY! DO NOT FILE IN MEMBER CASE!

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 18, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00071Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division RASHAD MATTHEW RIDDICK, Pro se Plaintiff, V. Civil No. 3:19-cv-71 (DJN) JACK BARBER, et ai., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Rashad Matthew Riddick (“Plaintiff”) brings this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Jack Barber (“Barber”), Hughes Melton (“Melton”), Rebecca A. Vauter (“Vauter”), Captain Bland (“Bland”), Dr. Nishant Parikh (“Dr. Parikh” or “Parikh”), Dr. Sridhar Yaratha (“Dr. Yaratha” or ““Yaratha”), Dr. Ted Simpson (“Dr. Simpson” or “Simpson”), Mr. Oni (“Oni”), Holly Ernouf…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API