Legal Opinion

Isbelle v. Denney

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided June 1, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00093Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO RYAN ISBELLE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00093-DCN Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND v. ORDER LAWRENCE DENNEY, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Lawrence Denney’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.14) Plaintiff Ryan Isbelle’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. 11). Having reviewed the record and briefs, the Court finds the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented. Accordingly, in the interest of avoiding further delay, and because the Court finds the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument, the Court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API