Legal Opinion

John F. Hinck and Pamela F. Hinck v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 4, 2006No. 05-5099PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

John and Pamela Hinck (collectively the “Hineks”) appeal from the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their suit for lack of jurisdiction. Hinck v. United States, 64 Fed.Cl. 71 (Fed.Cl.2005). Because the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the Hineks’ interest abatement claim, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Section 6404 of the Internal Revenue Code authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to abate a tax or liability assessment in certain circumstances. 1 In 1986, Congress amended § 6404 by adding a new subsection (e)(1) that, for the first…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hinck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Fry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. McNeil v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Grapevine Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API