Legal Opinion

Bordas v. Washtenaw County

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 2, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-40074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the court is a renewed motion for summary judgment by defendants, Marlene Ralph, Steven Armstrong, Michael Heilman, Joon Hur and Matthew Berchert, a group of Washtenaw County sheriffs deputies. On December 12, 1997, this court entered an order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment. As a part of that order, this court dismissed all plaintiffs claims against defendants, Washtenaw County and Washtenaw County Sheriff Ronald…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. BelknapDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API