Legal Opinion

In Re: Hexcel Corporation, Debtor. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. Harvey Construction Company, Hexcel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1998No. 97-15172Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

133 F.3d 927

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re: HEXCEL CORPORATION, Debtor.

BREWER & PRITCHARD, P.C.; Harvey Construction Company, Appellants,

HEXCEL CORPORATION, Appellee.

Nos. 97-15172, 97-15175.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 11, 1997.

Decided Jan. 12, 1998.

Before: ALDISERT**, D.W. NELSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

In a 1992…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Vincent v. Hughes Air West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. In Re Vylene Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. Vylene Enterprises, Inc. v. Naugles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API