Legal Opinion

Dunlap Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeals, 100 to 105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bell,

Testator provided in the 7th paragraph of his will that his residuary estate should be held in trust and should be divided into as many shares as there were children of his living at the time of his decease, and deceased children leaving issue living at the time of his decease. After providing for life estates testator further provided as folloAVS: “From and immediately after the death of my children and the issue of any deceased children living at the time of my decease I direct my. Executors and Trustees to divide the principal of the share of the one so dying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Britt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. McFadden EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Edmunds EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Fisher EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Simpson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dinkey EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Hope EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Bald EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Richley EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Cooper v. MilikovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API